한중관계와 사드(THAAD) 갈등

사드 배치 하나로 한국이 중국한테 수십조 원 피해 봄. 안보와 경제 사이의 딜레마를 보여주는 사례임.

사드가 뭔데

미국이 만든 미사일 방어 시스템. 날아오는 탄도미사일을 하강 단계에서 요격함. 레이더 탐지 거리 최대 2,000km. 이 레이더가 중국 군사 기지까지 탐지 가능하다는 게 중국 반발 이유임.

중국이 어떻게 보복했냐

'한한령'이라고 불리는 비공식 규제 시행. K-팝·드라마 중국 방송 금지. 한국 관광 단체 여행 금지. 롯데마트 소방 점검 빌미로 영업 정지. 현대·기아차 불매 운동 유도. 피해 추산 15조~20조 원.

롯데가 제일 많이 당함

사드 부지 내줬다가 중국 내 롯데마트 99개 대부분 영업 정지. 결국 2018년 중국 사업 철수. 철수 손실만 1조 원 이상.

3불 합의 논란

문재인 정부가 2017년 중국과 합의: ①사드 추가 배치 불가, ②미국 MD 체계 참여 불가, ③한미일 군사동맹 불가. 보수측: 주권 침해. 진보측도: 실리 없이 명분만 잃었다. 중국은 약속이라 하고 한국은 공식 합의 아니라고 반박.

지금은 어떠냐

사드 여전히 배치 중. 한한령 공식 해제됐지만 K-팝·게임 진입 제약 여전함. 한국 기업 중국 환경 2017년 이전으로 못 돌아감. 미중 갈등 심화로 한국의 포지션 딜레마 더 커지는 중.

한국과 중국 사이에 큰 갈등이 있었어요. 사드라는 미사일 방어 시스템 때문이에요.

사드가 뭐예요?

미국이 만든 미사일을 막는 시스템이에요. 적이 쏜 미사일이 날아올 때 하늘에서 터뜨려 막아주는 거예요. 한국을 지키기 위해 경북 성주에 설치했어요.

중국이 왜 화가 났나요?

이 시스템에는 먼 곳까지 볼 수 있는 강력한 레이더가 있어요. 중국은 이 레이더가 중국 군사 시설을 감시할 수 있다고 걱정했어요. 그래서 한국에 화가 많이 났어요.

어떤 영향이 있었나요?

중국이 한국 물건을 사지 않고, 한국 드라마도 못 보게 했어요. 중국 관광객도 한국에 못 오게 했어요. 이 때문에 한국이 수십 조 원 손해를 봤어요.

지금은 어떤가요?

사드는 지금도 설치되어 있어요. 한국과 중국 사이가 조금 나아졌지만, 아직 완전히 좋아지지는 않았어요. 안보(나라를 지키는 것)와 경제(돈을 버는 것) 사이에서 어떤 선택을 해야 할지 어른들이 계속 고민하고 있어요.

The Economic Impact and Aftermath of THAAD Deployment (2017)

The deployment of the first THAAD (Terminal High Altitude Area Defense) system in South Korea in 2017 came with substantial economic costs, estimated at tens of billions of dollars. China responded with economic retaliation through measures such as the "Korean Wave Restriction Order" (한한령), travel restrictions, and regulatory crackdowns on distribution, leading to societal tensions between security and economic interests that persisted until 2026 without full resolution.

What is THAAD?

THAAD, or Terminal High Altitude Area Defense, is a missile defense system developed by the United States designed to intercept ballistic missiles during their descent phase. With a radar detection range up to 2,000 kilometers, its capability to monitor Chinese military facilities sparked significant Chinese opposition. Following South Korea's announcement of THAAD deployment in 2016 and its actual placement in Seongju County, Gyeongsangbuk-do, in 2017, tensions escalated.

China's Economic Retaliation: The Korean Wave Restriction Order

Almost immediately following the announcement of THAAD deployment, China implemented informal regulations known as the "Korean Wave Restriction Order" (한한령). Key measures included banning Korean pop (K-pop) content on Chinese broadcasts, restricting imports of Korean dramas and films, prohibiting organized Korean tourist visits by Chinese citizens, halting operations of some Lotte Mart stores due to alleged fire safety violations, delaying customs clearance for Korean cosmetics, and encouraging boycotts of Hyundai and Kia vehicles among Chinese consumers. Economic losses were estimated between 15 trillion to 20 trillion won by Korean research institutions between 2017 and 2018 due to these restrictions.

Impact on Lotte Group

Lotte suffered the most significant damage by providing the THAAD deployment site. Approximately 99 Lotte Mart stores across China faced operational shutdowns due to alleged fire safety violations, among other reasons. Consequently, Lotte withdrew from its Chinese operations by 2018, incurring losses exceeding 1 trillion won during the process.

The "Three No" Agreement and Its Controversy

In October 2017, the Moon Jae-in administration attempted to normalize relations with China through a "Three No" agreement, which entailed: 1. No additional deployment of THAAD, 2. No participation in U.S. missile defense systems, 3. No enhancement of the U.S.-South Korea-Japan military alliance. This agreement remains one of the most contentious decisions in South Korea's diplomatic history, criticized by both conservative and progressive factions for perceived compromises on sovereignty and practical benefits. While China asserts this as a promise, South Korea maintains it was not an official agreement.

Shift in Relations (2022-2026)

With the inauguration of the Yoon Suk-yeol administration in 2022, strengthened U.S.-South Korea alliances led to a cooling of Sino-Korean relations. Enhanced security cooperation between South Korea, Japan, and the U.S., highlighted by the 2023 Camp David Declaration, further strained ties with China, compounded by South Korea's export controls on semiconductors, particularly HBM chips, adding to bilateral tensions. Despite economic interdependence, a complete severance of ties remains unlikely. THAAD remains a persistent structural conflict point in bilateral relations.

Current Status (2026)

As of 2026, THAAD deployment persists despite the official lifting of the Korean Wave Restriction Order. While restrictions on certain cultural exports like K-pop and gaming have eased, broader market access remains challenging for Korean businesses in China. The business environment for Korean companies in China has yet to recover to pre-2017 levels. The THAAD conflict underscores broader strategic questions regarding South Korea's positioning between the United States and China.

Related Topics

• Missile Defense Systems
• U.S.-South Korea Alliance
• Korean Wave Restriction Order
• Lotte Group's Withdrawal from China
• Three No Agreement
• U.S.-Japan-South Korea Security Cooperation
• Chinese Economic Retaliation
• Semiconductor Exports
• North Korean Missiles
• China-South Korea Free Trade Agreement

English version not yet available.

English version not yet available.